LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/401?query=lin+par
25 Nov 2025
Now available:
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Read or download →
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Latest on the 
Blog
Five Years Since ‘What About Me?’ A Call for a Commissioner for Separated Families
On Monday, 17 November 2025, the Family Solutions Group (FSG) marked a significant milestone, bringing together colleagues, partners and supporters to call for a Commissioner for Separated Families and to reflect on five years of work dedicated to improving the experience of separating families.
Parliamentary Debate Reveals Government’s Latest Intentions for Financial Remedies and Cohabitation Law Reform
The Government gave a significant update on Monday 10 November 2025 in the House of Lords regarding its plans for financial remedies and cohabitation law reform. It signals a major overhaul of how the law treats relationship breakdown across all types of couples.
Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction
Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation.
Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings
In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently?
She Who Laughs Last? Pets, Perpetuities, and Other Problems with the Last Will and Testament of Taylor A. Swift.
Taylor Swift's 'Anti-Hero' may be the only pop song to feature a contentious probate dispute. This article considers the drafting problems of Taylor Swift's Will from the perspective of the law of England and Wales.
Make Ancillary Relief Great Again
The Class Legal Financial Remedies Conference may have new branding but with matching socks, MAGA caps and squeezy judges (courtesy of the executive sponsors 3PB barristers) it did not disappoint!
