FRC Corner Financial Remedies Court: Structure Regional Guidance Open in FRC Lead Judges - July 2026 FRC-Lead-Judges-Courts-March-2026FRC-Lead-Judges-Courts-March-2026.pdf115 KBdownload-circle Related Centralisation Practice Note 27.03.25 Centralisation Practice Note 27.03.25centralisation-practice-note-27.03.25.pdf77 KBdownload-circle LONDON FRC FEBRUARY 2025 PRACTICE NOTE FOR PRACTITIONERS LONDON FRC FEBRUARY 2025 PRACTICE NOTE FOR PRACTITIONERSlondon-frc-february-2025-practice-note-for-practitioners.pdf261 KBdownload-circle Financial Remedy Court Organogram - August 2026 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - August 2026The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - August 2026.pdf797 KBdownload-circle Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related Centralisation Practice Note 27.03.25 Centralisation Practice Note 27.03.25centralisation-practice-note-27.03.25.pdf77 KBdownload-circle LONDON FRC FEBRUARY 2025 PRACTICE NOTE FOR PRACTITIONERS LONDON FRC FEBRUARY 2025 PRACTICE NOTE FOR PRACTITIONERSlondon-frc-february-2025-practice-note-for-practitioners.pdf261 KBdownload-circle Financial Remedy Court Organogram - August 2026 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - August 2026The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - August 2026.pdf797 KBdownload-circle Latest The Astonishing Fate of Scott v Scott (1911-1913) Secrecy in family cases from the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes (1858) to the Financial Remedies Court (2024) The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality The requirement to serve a statement of costs (Form N260) for the purposes of summary assessment of costs is set out in CPR PD 44 para 9.5. But what are the consequences of a breach of the rule to serve the statement of costs not less than 24 hours before the start of the hearing? Is It Time for the Conclusions in Waggott to Be Reconsidered? There is arguably a far greater understanding now than there was even as recently as 2018 of domestic abuse and the wide-reaching and long-lasting impact that it can have. Does this mean it is time for the Court of Appeal to reconsider the conclusions it reached in Waggott? is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
Centralisation Practice Note 27.03.25 Centralisation Practice Note 27.03.25centralisation-practice-note-27.03.25.pdf77 KBdownload-circle
LONDON FRC FEBRUARY 2025 PRACTICE NOTE FOR PRACTITIONERS LONDON FRC FEBRUARY 2025 PRACTICE NOTE FOR PRACTITIONERSlondon-frc-february-2025-practice-note-for-practitioners.pdf261 KBdownload-circle
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - August 2026 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - August 2026The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - August 2026.pdf797 KBdownload-circle
Centralisation Practice Note 27.03.25 Centralisation Practice Note 27.03.25centralisation-practice-note-27.03.25.pdf77 KBdownload-circle
LONDON FRC FEBRUARY 2025 PRACTICE NOTE FOR PRACTITIONERS LONDON FRC FEBRUARY 2025 PRACTICE NOTE FOR PRACTITIONERSlondon-frc-february-2025-practice-note-for-practitioners.pdf261 KBdownload-circle
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - August 2026 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - August 2026The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - August 2026.pdf797 KBdownload-circle
The Astonishing Fate of Scott v Scott (1911-1913) Secrecy in family cases from the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes (1858) to the Financial Remedies Court (2024)
The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality The requirement to serve a statement of costs (Form N260) for the purposes of summary assessment of costs is set out in CPR PD 44 para 9.5. But what are the consequences of a breach of the rule to serve the statement of costs not less than 24 hours before the start of the hearing?
Is It Time for the Conclusions in Waggott to Be Reconsidered? There is arguably a far greater understanding now than there was even as recently as 2018 of domestic abuse and the wide-reaching and long-lasting impact that it can have. Does this mean it is time for the Court of Appeal to reconsider the conclusions it reached in Waggott?