TW v TM [2015] EWHC 3054 (Fam)
Judgment date: 24 July 2015
Related
Re A Child (Schedule 1, 1989 Act; Variation) [2025] EWHC 1254 (Fam)
McKendrick J. Final Hearing concerning cross-Schedule 1 and specific issue applications brought by both parties. The High Court dismissed all but the respondent father’s application to release his intermediary from undertakings.
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v LR & Anor [2025] EWFC 271 (B)
DJ Guirguis. Exercising the power contained in s 32 of the Child Support Act 1991, the court set aside a transfer of property and injuncted the respondents from further dispositions to defeat child maintenance claims.
Re: H (A Child) (Appeal: Child Maintenance)
Henke J. A failed appeal by the father against the extension of the duration of a child maintenance order beyond the age of eighteen years.
Read the journal


Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
Re A Child (Schedule 1, 1989 Act; Variation) [2025] EWHC 1254 (Fam)
McKendrick J. Final Hearing concerning cross-Schedule 1 and specific issue applications brought by both parties. The High Court dismissed all but the respondent father’s application to release his intermediary from undertakings.
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v LR & Anor [2025] EWFC 271 (B)
DJ Guirguis. Exercising the power contained in s 32 of the Child Support Act 1991, the court set aside a transfer of property and injuncted the respondents from further dispositions to defeat child maintenance claims.
Re: H (A Child) (Appeal: Child Maintenance)
Henke J. A failed appeal by the father against the extension of the duration of a child maintenance order beyond the age of eighteen years.
Latest

Open Justice in the Modern Age
A guest lecture delivered on Tuesday, 7 October 2025, at 6pm, at George Town, Grand Cayman.

Applied Theatre and the Advocacy Gap in Financial Remedies
Closing the gap between legal recognition and judicial persuasion.

War (of the Roses) – What Is It Good For?
The release of a new film has sparked a wave of commentary from the press and family lawyers alike. It shows that bloody mindedness and divorce are a timeless combination. Contains spoilers!