KMR v AER [2026] EWFC 10 (B)
DDJ Benjamin Rose. Judgment considering high-value assets, non-disclosure, jurisdictional questions, issues surrounding the validity of a nuptial settlement and general conduct of proceedings.
Latest
K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)
DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.
AGS v RKS [2026] EWFC 104 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/104?query=AGS+RKS+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+104+%28B%29#download-options
FG v BN (Appeal Out of Time) [2026] EWFC 101 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/101?query=FG+BN+%28Appeal+Out+Time%29+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+101+%28B%29
Standard Family Orders (Volume 1): Financial Remedy Orders
Below are the Standard Family Orders (Volume 1), released on 11th May 2026.
Order 1.1 - Financial Directions Order (longer version)Order 1.1 - Financial Directions Order (longer version).docx99 KBdownload-circleOrder 1.2 - Financial Directions Order (shorter version)Order 1.2 - Financial Directions Order (shorter version)
Varsha Bhadresh Gohil v Bhadresh Babulal Gohil & Ors [2025] EWHC 3646 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/3646?query=%5B2025%5D+EWHC+3646+%28Fam%29
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.