Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270
Judgment date: 11 April 2017
Related
Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination
This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
Special Contributions: ‘Genius’, Guesswork and Gender Discrimination
This article revisits the contested terrain of ‘special contribution’, and questions whether it retains any legitimate role in contemporary financial remedy jurisprudence. It argues that the concept is both theoretically discriminatory and practically uncertain.
SS v IS [2023] EWHC 1544 (Fam)
Judgment date: 14 June 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1544
Roberts J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings with issues around spousal maintenance, offshore trusts and non-matrimonial assets.
Background
The parties met as students in 2003 in Russia and married in 2004. They had essentially no
DR v UG [2023] EWFC 68
Judgment date: 05 April 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/68
Moor J. The parties were Danish. H was aged 57 and W aged 49. Children aged 18, 16, and 16. Married 2004, marriage broke down in 2019.
H was CEO of a drugs manufacturer but staged a
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.