Hohn v Cooper-Hohn [2014] EWHC 2314 (Fam)
Judgment date: 07 July 2014
Related
Re HMP [2025] EWCA Civ 824
Carr LCJ, King LJ and Warby LJ. The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against a disclosure order in concluded care proceedings, confirming that the open justice principle did not extend to media applications unconnected to the court's decision-making in the case.
Tickle v The Father & Ors [2025] EWFC 160
Judgment date: 09 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/160
Henke J. Procedural judgment in children proceedings reaffirming legal protections for journalistic sources and highlighting the limits of transparency in the family courts.
Henke J delivered a discrete procedural judgment following a fact-finding hearing on 2 May
Absence of Authority?
In G v S (Family Law Act 1996: Publicity) [2024] EWFC 231 (B) (6 June 2024) HHJ Reardon asked:
‘What is the default position in terms of publication in a case where s 12 [of the Administration of Justice Act 1969] does not apply?’
And answered:
‘42. … I would suggest,
Related
Re HMP [2025] EWCA Civ 824
Carr LCJ, King LJ and Warby LJ. The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against a disclosure order in concluded care proceedings, confirming that the open justice principle did not extend to media applications unconnected to the court's decision-making in the case.
Tickle v The Father & Ors [2025] EWFC 160
Judgment date: 09 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/160
Henke J. Procedural judgment in children proceedings reaffirming legal protections for journalistic sources and highlighting the limits of transparency in the family courts.
Henke J delivered a discrete procedural judgment following a fact-finding hearing on 2 May
Absence of Authority?
In G v S (Family Law Act 1996: Publicity) [2024] EWFC 231 (B) (6 June 2024) HHJ Reardon asked:
‘What is the default position in terms of publication in a case where s 12 [of the Administration of Justice Act 1969] does not apply?’
And answered:
‘42. … I would suggest,
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.