Cases
Spousal Maintenance (Quantum)
Variation Applications
Duxbury Capitalisation
Compensation Principle
H v H [2014] EWCA Civ 1523
Judgment date: 02 December 2014
Related
ABC v XYZ (Financial Remedies: Release from Undertakings and Variation of Periodical Payments Order) [2025] EWFC 370 (B)
DJ Maddison. Application by H to be released from undertakings and vary a nominal maintenance order following a significant change of circumstances. Reassessment of needs resulted in substantive joint lives provision.
NI v AD [2025] EWHC 2997 (Fam)
Trowell J. Wife (NI) and husband (AD) cohabited for 7 years and share 3 children, aged, 11, 9 and 8 years. This is a cross application for financial relief upon their divorce. Oral evidence was heard from husband, wife and two expert forensic accountants.
ABC v XYZ [2025] EWFC 370 (B)
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2025/370.html
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
ABC v XYZ (Financial Remedies: Release from Undertakings and Variation of Periodical Payments Order) [2025] EWFC 370 (B)
DJ Maddison. Application by H to be released from undertakings and vary a nominal maintenance order following a significant change of circumstances. Reassessment of needs resulted in substantive joint lives provision.
NI v AD [2025] EWHC 2997 (Fam)
Trowell J. Wife (NI) and husband (AD) cohabited for 7 years and share 3 children, aged, 11, 9 and 8 years. This is a cross application for financial relief upon their divorce. Oral evidence was heard from husband, wife and two expert forensic accountants.
ABC v XYZ [2025] EWFC 370 (B)
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2025/370.html
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.