Besharova v Berezovsky [2016] EWCA Civ 161
Judgment date: 22 March 2016
Related
Kathryn Elizabeth Norman v Michael Ian Norman [2025] EWFC 107 (B)
Judgment date: 17 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/107
District Judge Veal. Alleged material non-disclosure, W’s totally without merit application issued in October 2024 after seven rounds of litigation including W’s D50K application, settled by agreement, made when she knew about H’s
Simon v Simon [2025] EWFC 89
Judgment date: 07 April 2025
Peel J. Cost judgment from Peel J in ‘highly unusual’ financial remedy proceedings, in which a litigation loan provider successfully applied to be joined and to set aside a consent order which prevented them recovering a loan to W.
Issues
The issue for the court
A v M (No. 2) – Construing a Court Order After the Unforeseen Occurs
How should provisions of a court order that are in dispute be construed?
This question most often arises in the context of consent orders. As stated in Besharova v Berezovsky [2016] EWCA Civ 161 per Sir Stephen Richards at [11]:
‘the principles applicable to the construction of a consent order
Related
Kathryn Elizabeth Norman v Michael Ian Norman [2025] EWFC 107 (B)
Judgment date: 17 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/107
District Judge Veal. Alleged material non-disclosure, W’s totally without merit application issued in October 2024 after seven rounds of litigation including W’s D50K application, settled by agreement, made when she knew about H’s
Simon v Simon [2025] EWFC 89
Judgment date: 07 April 2025
Peel J. Cost judgment from Peel J in ‘highly unusual’ financial remedy proceedings, in which a litigation loan provider successfully applied to be joined and to set aside a consent order which prevented them recovering a loan to W.
Issues
The issue for the court
A v M (No. 2) – Construing a Court Order After the Unforeseen Occurs
How should provisions of a court order that are in dispute be construed?
This question most often arises in the context of consent orders. As stated in Besharova v Berezovsky [2016] EWCA Civ 161 per Sir Stephen Richards at [11]:
‘the principles applicable to the construction of a consent order
Latest
Ministry of Justice Breaches the Overriding Objective
It is fundamental to the procedural code that dealing with a case justly includes ‘expeditiously and fairly’. The savage cuts imposed by the MOJ, with very limited notice and no widespread consultation, will lead to ‘justice delayed’, i.e. ‘justice denied’.
Your Backup Trial Is Arbitration: the London Financial Remedy Changes
New language has entered the lexicon of London financial remedy lawyers. The Dictionary of Financial Remedies needs a new entry. A spectre has appeared on the horizon casting horrors of preparation for practitioners. Enter the backup trial. How have we got here?
The Financial Remedies Journal annual essay competition
The editorial board of the Financial Remedies Journal is delighted to announce the launch of its second essay competition, which will be open to any undergraduate law or GDL law student from a University in England and Wales. We particularly invite submissions from those who do not yet have a