Besharova v Berezovsky [2016] EWCA Civ 161
Judgment date: 22 March 2016
Related
Kathryn Elizabeth Norman v Michael Ian Norman [2025] EWFC 107 (B)
Judgment date: 17 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/107
District Judge Veal. Alleged material non-disclosure, W’s totally without merit application issued in October 2024 after seven rounds of litigation including W’s D50K application, settled by agreement, made when she knew about H’s
Simon v Simon [2025] EWFC 89
Judgment date: 07 April 2025
Peel J. Cost judgment from Peel J in ‘highly unusual’ financial remedy proceedings, in which a litigation loan provider successfully applied to be joined and to set aside a consent order which prevented them recovering a loan to W.
Issues
The issue for the court
A v M (No. 2) – Construing a Court Order After the Unforeseen Occurs
How should provisions of a court order that are in dispute be construed?
This question most often arises in the context of consent orders. As stated in Besharova v Berezovsky [2016] EWCA Civ 161 per Sir Stephen Richards at [11]:
‘the principles applicable to the construction of a consent order
Related
Kathryn Elizabeth Norman v Michael Ian Norman [2025] EWFC 107 (B)
Judgment date: 17 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/107
District Judge Veal. Alleged material non-disclosure, W’s totally without merit application issued in October 2024 after seven rounds of litigation including W’s D50K application, settled by agreement, made when she knew about H’s
Simon v Simon [2025] EWFC 89
Judgment date: 07 April 2025
Peel J. Cost judgment from Peel J in ‘highly unusual’ financial remedy proceedings, in which a litigation loan provider successfully applied to be joined and to set aside a consent order which prevented them recovering a loan to W.
Issues
The issue for the court
A v M (No. 2) – Construing a Court Order After the Unforeseen Occurs
How should provisions of a court order that are in dispute be construed?
This question most often arises in the context of consent orders. As stated in Besharova v Berezovsky [2016] EWCA Civ 161 per Sir Stephen Richards at [11]:
‘the principles applicable to the construction of a consent order
Latest
Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction
Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation.
Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings
In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently?
She Who Laughs Last? Pets, Perpetuities, and Other Problems with the Last Will and Testament of Taylor A. Swift.
Taylor Swift's 'Anti-Hero' may be the only pop song to feature a contentious probate dispute. This article considers the drafting problems of Taylor Swift's Will from the perspective of the law of England and Wales.