TLATA Applications Housing Need Joinder of Third Parties national archives Open in A v N [2025] EWFC 371 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/371 Recorder Christopher Stirling Related Bartok v Brunner [2026] EWFC 146 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/146 McGregor v Smith (Domicile/Misuse of Divorce Portal) [2026] EWFC 128 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/128 Broadfield Law UK LLP v Emily Barnes [2026] EWCA Civ 698 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/698 Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Open in Related Bartok v Brunner [2026] EWFC 146 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/146 McGregor v Smith (Domicile/Misuse of Divorce Portal) [2026] EWFC 128 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/128 Broadfield Law UK LLP v Emily Barnes [2026] EWCA Civ 698 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/698 Latest Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims [2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well. A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs). 50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose? [2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
McGregor v Smith (Domicile/Misuse of Divorce Portal) [2026] EWFC 128 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/128
Broadfield Law UK LLP v Emily Barnes [2026] EWCA Civ 698 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/698
McGregor v Smith (Domicile/Misuse of Divorce Portal) [2026] EWFC 128 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/128
Broadfield Law UK LLP v Emily Barnes [2026] EWCA Civ 698 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/698
Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims [2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well.
A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs).
50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose? [2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair.