Y v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] EWFC B40

Judgment date: 28 July 2021

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2021/B40.html

Related

The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v LR & Anor [2025] EWFC 271 (B)

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/271?query=2025+ewfc+271+%28B%29

A Mother v A Father (Re Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989) [2024] EWFC 63

Judgment date: 19 February 2024 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/63.html HHJ Vincent. Schedule 1 matter determined in light of the child’s needs and the strict remit of Schedule 1, notwithstanding the significant disparity between the parents’ respective economic positions and standards of living.

SP v QR [2024] EWFC 57 (B)

Judgment date: 12 March 2024 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/57.html HHJ Hess. Schedule 1 application with a ‘more modest’ asset base regarding residence in a property subject to a mortgage and ‘top-up’ maintenance for a disabled child. Background The applicant mother was 37 years

Read the journal

Related

The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v LR & Anor [2025] EWFC 271 (B)

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/271?query=2025+ewfc+271+%28B%29

A Mother v A Father (Re Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989) [2024] EWFC 63

Judgment date: 19 February 2024 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/63.html HHJ Vincent. Schedule 1 matter determined in light of the child’s needs and the strict remit of Schedule 1, notwithstanding the significant disparity between the parents’ respective economic positions and standards of living.

SP v QR [2024] EWFC 57 (B)

Judgment date: 12 March 2024 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2024/57.html HHJ Hess. Schedule 1 application with a ‘more modest’ asset base regarding residence in a property subject to a mortgage and ‘top-up’ maintenance for a disabled child. Background The applicant mother was 37 years

Latest

Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases

Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases

[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.

Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH

Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH

HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.

Book Review: Financial Remedies Handbook 2025

Book Review: Financial Remedies Handbook 2025

[2026] 1 FRJ 74. Rhys Taylor reviews the 15th edition of Financial Remedies Handbook 2026, by District Judge Sophie Harrison, published by LexisNexis, and says every financial remedy lawyer should have it by their side.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS