Work v Gray [2016] EWHC 562 (Fam)
Judgment date: 15 February 2016
Related
Michael v Michael (No. 3) [2025] EWFC 245
HHJ Hess, sitting as a DHCJ, addressing business valuations in a financial remedy final hearing.
CMS Liability Orders and Appeals Against Liability Orders Made in the Magistrates' Court
Over the course of the last few years, I have dealt with a number of appeals against the making of liability orders and have published a couple of judgments where I think points have arisen which others may benefit from seeing how I have dealt with them. It is my
SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4183 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2014
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4183.html
Related
Michael v Michael (No. 3) [2025] EWFC 245
HHJ Hess, sitting as a DHCJ, addressing business valuations in a financial remedy final hearing.
CMS Liability Orders and Appeals Against Liability Orders Made in the Magistrates' Court
Over the course of the last few years, I have dealt with a number of appeals against the making of liability orders and have published a couple of judgments where I think points have arisen which others may benefit from seeing how I have dealt with them. It is my
SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4183 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2014
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4183.html
Latest
Sir James Munby: an Obituary
Sir Nicholas Mostyn writes about the life of Sir James Munby, who died on 1 January 2026: "a great leader, a brilliant historian, a remarkable lawyer, and a superb writer".
PD 27A Redux: March 2026 Family Court Bundle Changes Primer
The President has promulgated a revised PD 27A which will come into force on 2 March 2026, designed to modernise the law and embed best practice into one chaptered Practice Direction. This article sets out the key changes practitioners and litigants should be aware of in family proceedings.
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.