Work v Gray [2016] EWHC 562 (Fam)
Judgment date: 15 February 2016
Related
Michael v Michael (No. 3) [2025] EWFC 245
HHJ Hess, sitting as a DHCJ, addressing business valuations in a financial remedy final hearing.
CMS Liability Orders and Appeals Against Liability Orders Made in the Magistrates' Court
Over the course of the last few years, I have dealt with a number of appeals against the making of liability orders and have published a couple of judgments where I think points have arisen which others may benefit from seeing how I have dealt with them. It is my
SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4183 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2014
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4183.html
Related
Michael v Michael (No. 3) [2025] EWFC 245
HHJ Hess, sitting as a DHCJ, addressing business valuations in a financial remedy final hearing.
CMS Liability Orders and Appeals Against Liability Orders Made in the Magistrates' Court
Over the course of the last few years, I have dealt with a number of appeals against the making of liability orders and have published a couple of judgments where I think points have arisen which others may benefit from seeing how I have dealt with them. It is my
SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4183 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2014
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4183.html
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.