Wells v Wells [1999] 1 AC 345, HL
Judgment date: 16 July 1998
Related
Is Duxbury Dead?
The Spring 2025 issue of this journal led off with the eagerly awaited, 21-page Final Report of the Duxbury Working Party ([2025] 1 FRJ 3). As one would expect from its distinguished authors, the report is engaging, well written and skilfully argued, albeit that for reasons I shall advance hereafter
VTY v GDB [2025] EWFC 110 (B)
Judgment date: 24 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/110
Recorder Taylor. Final hearing in a financial remedy application which concerned issues of non-disclosure and allegations of asset concealment in different countries. The matter also involved foreign litigation which appeared to undermine the existing proceedings in
GH v IH [2025] EWFC 120 (B)
Judgment date: 10 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/120
District Judge Hatvany. Final hearing on enforcement and variation of 2012 financial remedy order. The primary issue to be determined was the enforcement and variation of a joint lives periodical payments order made in 2012. The
Related
Is Duxbury Dead?
The Spring 2025 issue of this journal led off with the eagerly awaited, 21-page Final Report of the Duxbury Working Party ([2025] 1 FRJ 3). As one would expect from its distinguished authors, the report is engaging, well written and skilfully argued, albeit that for reasons I shall advance hereafter
VTY v GDB [2025] EWFC 110 (B)
Judgment date: 24 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/110
Recorder Taylor. Final hearing in a financial remedy application which concerned issues of non-disclosure and allegations of asset concealment in different countries. The matter also involved foreign litigation which appeared to undermine the existing proceedings in
GH v IH [2025] EWFC 120 (B)
Judgment date: 10 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/120
District Judge Hatvany. Final hearing on enforcement and variation of 2012 financial remedy order. The primary issue to be determined was the enforcement and variation of a joint lives periodical payments order made in 2012. The
Latest
Ministry of Justice Breaches the Overriding Objective
It is fundamental to the procedural code that dealing with a case justly includes ‘expeditiously and fairly’. The savage cuts imposed by the MOJ, with very limited notice and no widespread consultation, will lead to ‘justice delayed’, i.e. ‘justice denied’.
Your Backup Trial Is Arbitration: the London Financial Remedy Changes
New language has entered the lexicon of London financial remedy lawyers. The Dictionary of Financial Remedies needs a new entry. A spectre has appeared on the horizon casting horrors of preparation for practitioners. Enter the backup trial. How have we got here?
The Financial Remedies Journal annual essay competition
The editorial board of the Financial Remedies Journal is delighted to announce the launch of its second essay competition, which will be open to any undergraduate law or GDL law student from a University in England and Wales. We particularly invite submissions from those who do not yet have a