UD v DN [2021] EWCA Civ 1947
Judgment date: 21 December 2021
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/UD-v-DN-judgment.pdf
Related
Re N (A Child) (Financial Provision: Contact Travel Costs) [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
DDJ Vickers. Mother’s application for financial support pursuant to Schedule 1 Children Act 1989. She sought orders for periodical payments including backdated payments. Father sought reimbursement for various child-related expenses he had incurred and to offset that against her claim.
N (A child) (Financial provision: contact travel costs), Re [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/18?query=N+%28A+Child%29%2C+Re+%28Financial+provision%3A+contact+travel+costs%29+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+18+%28B%29
MH v FD [2025] EWFC 390
Mr Justin Warshaw KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Application for interim relief within proceedings brought under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989. The father took the 'millionaire's defence'.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Re N (A Child) (Financial Provision: Contact Travel Costs) [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
DDJ Vickers. Mother’s application for financial support pursuant to Schedule 1 Children Act 1989. She sought orders for periodical payments including backdated payments. Father sought reimbursement for various child-related expenses he had incurred and to offset that against her claim.
N (A child) (Financial provision: contact travel costs), Re [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/18?query=N+%28A+Child%29%2C+Re+%28Financial+provision%3A+contact+travel+costs%29+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+18+%28B%29
MH v FD [2025] EWFC 390
Mr Justin Warshaw KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Application for interim relief within proceedings brought under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989. The father took the 'millionaire's defence'.
Latest
A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals
On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs).
50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose?
[2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair.
Maybe Compensation Isn’t What You Think
[2026] 2 FRJ 118. The compensation principle set out in Miller; McFarlane is the logical next step in ending discrimination between different but equal contributions. Compensation is a vehicle to alleviate post-divorce disparity, to give both spouses an equal start on the road to independent living.