FRC Corner National Guidance Financial Remedies Court: Announcements The Financial Remedies Court – The Way Forward. A Paper to consider changes to the Practices and Procedures in the Financial Remedies Court Report of the Farquhar Committee - Part 2 - The Financial Remedies Court - The Way Forward - September 2021report-of-the-farquhar-committee-part-2-the-financial-remedies-court-the-way-forward-september-2021.pdf2 MBdownload-circle Related Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle Family Listing Guidance - January 2024 FAMILY-LISTING-GUIDANCE_January-2024family-listing-guidance_january-2024.pdf2 MBdownload-circle Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Related Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle Family Listing Guidance - January 2024 FAMILY-LISTING-GUIDANCE_January-2024family-listing-guidance_january-2024.pdf2 MBdownload-circle Latest FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court. The Reluctant Pension Credit Member [2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented. Housing Particulars: Mind The Gap What can the court do when there's a significant gap between the bottom of the applicant’s range and the top of the respondent’s range? Can the court take up the invitation made by counsel to ‘conduct its own research on Rightmove if it wishes’? is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle
Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle
Family Listing Guidance - January 2024 FAMILY-LISTING-GUIDANCE_January-2024family-listing-guidance_january-2024.pdf2 MBdownload-circle
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle
Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle
Family Listing Guidance - January 2024 FAMILY-LISTING-GUIDANCE_January-2024family-listing-guidance_january-2024.pdf2 MBdownload-circle
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member [2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.
Housing Particulars: Mind The Gap What can the court do when there's a significant gap between the bottom of the applicant’s range and the top of the respondent’s range? Can the court take up the invitation made by counsel to ‘conduct its own research on Rightmove if it wishes’?