Single Joint Experts

Two Heads, Better than One? BR v BR, in Light of BR v BR (No 2) and Vince v Vince

Two Heads, Better than One? BR v BR, in Light of BR v BR (No 2) and Vince v Vince

In his judgment in BR v BR [2024] EWFC 11, [2024] 2 FLR 217, Peel J emphasised at [17](i) that ‘[w]herever possible’ the instruction of a single joint expert (SJE) is the ‘default position’ and at [17](ii) that a ‘high degree of justification’ is required for two

Money Corner: EBITDA – The Valuer’s Measure of Profit

Money Corner: EBITDA – The Valuer’s Measure of Profit

It is often said that ‘valuation is an art, not a science’. Whilst it is undoubtedly true that value is in the eye of the beholder the reference to art rather than science should not be taken as meaning there are not right and wrong ways to approach the valuation

Single and Joint: Peel J Discusses Expert Evidence in BR v BR [2024] EWFC 11

Single and Joint: Peel J Discusses Expert Evidence in BR v BR [2024] EWFC 11

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2024/11.html Disclaimer: Amelia Alston and Alex Laing represent (with Simon Bruce, Sarah Jane Lenihan and Isabela Maculan of Dawson Cornwell and Richard Todd KC of 1 Hare Court Chambers) the applicant wife in BR v BR [2024] EWFC 11. In