Needs

A Wife v A Husband [2023] EWFC 200

Judgment date: 09 November 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/200.html HHJ Willans. Financial remedy application involving a single issue, namely, what were W’s housing needs and how should those needs be funded. There had been a jurisdictional dispute between Italy and England, with

AZ v BZ (Financial Remedies Appeal) [2020] EWFC B86

Judgment date: 22 May 2022 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2020/B86.html HHJ Vincent. Appeal by H of a financial remedy order where on a clean break basis the assets were divided 99/1 in favour of W. The asset pool was modest, mostly made up

Butler v Butler [2023] EWHC 2453 (Fam)

Judgment date: 24 August 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/2453 Moor J. Does judge have to satisfy both parties’ needs in a needs case? Appeal in modest asset case where first instance order did not meet W’s needs. H (64) and W (53). 6 year

LT v ZU [2023] EWFC 179

Judgment date: 06 October 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/179.html HHJ Evans-Gordon. Substantive hearing following the father challenging an application by the mother to convert an arbitral award into an order of the court. See earlier decision in LT v ZU [2022] EWFC 206.

LT v ZU [2022] EWFC 206

Judgment date: 28 December 2022 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/206 Application by the father challenging an arbitral award concerning provision for the parties’ two children pursuant to Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. The challenge was on two general grounds: (1) the arbitrator had no power

Ditchfield v Ditchfield [2023] EWHC 2303 (Fam)

Judgment date: 20 September 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/2303.html Peel J. Appeal by H of a final financial remedy order where on a clean break basis the assets were divided 62/38 in favour of W. Division was based on H having better

Augousti v Matharu [2023] EWHC 1900 (Fam)

Judgment date: 10 August 2023 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1900 Mostyn J. Decision on permission to appeal on grounds which were considered to be totally without merit and applications for reporting restriction order. H advanced 21 grounds of appeal and made an application to adduce fresh