Anonymity and Transparency

D Culligan v A Culligan (No.2) (Costs and Anonymity) [2025] EWFC 26

Judgment date: 26 February 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/26 Macdonald J. Background Judgment dealing solely with the issues of costs and whether the substantive judgment in the financial remedies proceedings handed down on 14 January 2025 should be anonymised. Costs W’s costs in this case

Mary-Jane Grace and Ian Douglas Grace [2025] EWFC 37 (B)

Judgment date: 10 January 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/37 HHJ Farquhar. Straightforward financial remedy proceedings continued an additional 2½ years after the agreement at the FDR. Significant litigation misconduct, far beyond acceptable standards, resulting in striking delay and wasted costs orders; criticism also of conduct

Goodman v Walker [2024] EWFC 212 (B)

Judgment date: 23 July 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/212 HHJ Hess. High-profile Schedule 1 Final Hearing between Lauryn Goodman and Kyle Walker in which the judge made transparency orders in accordance with the guidance set out in the Transparency Reporting Pilot for Financial Remedy Proceedings.

P v Q, R and S [2024] EWFC 164 (B)

Judgment date: 19 June 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/164 District Judge Veal. Final hearing concerning W’s claim in financial remedy proceedings for a beneficial interest in two properties which had been bought and renovated by H and the intervenors, H’s parents. District Judge

AFW v RFH [2023] EWFC 119

Judgment date: 20 July 2023 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2023/119.html Recorder Laura Moys. Enforcement of order for sale and PSO. H found to have breached several provisions of FR order. He refused to cooperate in the sale of the FMH, in which H was