Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2026/439
LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401 Peel J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The couple's 2002 draft consent order had not been sealed by the court, but the parties had acted upon it with the belief that it had been formalised. Peel J determined that it constituted a Xydhias agreement.
Maxine Reid-Roberts & Anor v Hsiao Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/49
HA v EN [2025] EWHC 2436 (Fam) The Hon. Richard Todd KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge). Court varies Xydhias agreement, imposing significant contingent reduction in maintenance following change in circumstances.
FO v PN [2025] EWFC 327 (B) In this judgment, HHJ Edward Hess explores the weight which should be given to pre-nuptial agreements and Deeds of Revocations where the Deed of Revocation is entered into shortly before the demise of a marriage.
Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055 King, Moylan and Snowden LJJ. The Court of Appeal allowed the husband’s appeal against the final order made by Francis J on 15 March 2024, emphasising the importance of full and frank disclosure in pre-nuptial agreements when agreed by the parties.
PN v SA [2025] EWFC 141 Judgment date: 23 May 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/141 Cobb J. Third-largest financial remedy case in the jurisdiction’s history. The judge set aside a separation agreement entered into by W under significant emotional and psychological pressure. Background W (48), H (46). Three children aged between