A v Z [2026] EWHC 654 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2026/654
A v Z - Find Case Law - The National Archives
MR JUSTICE TROWELL
Related
Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2026/439
LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401
Peel J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The couple's 2002 draft consent order had not been sealed by the court, but the parties had acted upon it with the belief that it had been formalised. Peel J determined that it constituted a Xydhias agreement.
Maxine Reid-Roberts & Anor v Hsiao Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/49
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2026/439
LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401
Peel J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The couple's 2002 draft consent order had not been sealed by the court, but the parties had acted upon it with the belief that it had been formalised. Peel J determined that it constituted a Xydhias agreement.
Maxine Reid-Roberts & Anor v Hsiao Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/49
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.