Stodgell v Stodgell [2009] EWCA Civ 243
Judgment date: 12 February 2009
Related
Gohil v Gohil and CPS [2023] EWHC 1567 (Fam)
Judgment date: 27 June 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/1567.html
Mostyn J. The case concerned the inexplicable differences that accompany a draft judgment handed down respectively in the King’s Bench Division, the Family Division, and the Crown Court. H was served by the
Criminal Confiscation, Trusts of Land and Financial Remedies
Background
Convicted criminals may find themselves subject to confiscation applications and orders. These might be accompanied by a trust of land or financial remedy application, by a (perhaps not so) innocent applicant. How do confiscation proceedings work generally? How do they interact with family proceedings? This article gives a general
R v May [2008] UKHL 28
Judgment date: 14 May 2008
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2008/28.html
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
Gohil v Gohil and CPS [2023] EWHC 1567 (Fam)
Judgment date: 27 June 2023
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/1567.html
Mostyn J. The case concerned the inexplicable differences that accompany a draft judgment handed down respectively in the King’s Bench Division, the Family Division, and the Crown Court. H was served by the
Criminal Confiscation, Trusts of Land and Financial Remedies
Background
Convicted criminals may find themselves subject to confiscation applications and orders. These might be accompanied by a trust of land or financial remedy application, by a (perhaps not so) innocent applicant. How do confiscation proceedings work generally? How do they interact with family proceedings? This article gives a general
R v May [2008] UKHL 28
Judgment date: 14 May 2008
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2008/28.html
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.