S v S [2014] EWHC 4732 (Fam)

Judgment date: 15 December 2014

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4732.html

Related

Needs Must as the Devil Drives: An Analysis of Pension Sharing in Needs Cases

[2026] 1 FRJ 43. Despite PAG1 and W v H [2020] EWFC B10 stressing the importance of treating a case on its own facts, somehow a view developed that pensions should inevitably be divided to achieve equality of income in all ‘needs’ cases. The source is unclear, but it’s worth starting with PAG1.

RKV v JWC [2025] EWFC 430 (B)

Recorder Rhys Taylor. Final hearing in W’s financial remedy application before Recorder Taylor in a case involving significant non-disclosure and non-engagement by H.

JK v LM [2026] EWFC 32 (B)

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/32?court=ewfc

Read the journal

Related

Needs Must as the Devil Drives: An Analysis of Pension Sharing in Needs Cases

[2026] 1 FRJ 43. Despite PAG1 and W v H [2020] EWFC B10 stressing the importance of treating a case on its own facts, somehow a view developed that pensions should inevitably be divided to achieve equality of income in all ‘needs’ cases. The source is unclear, but it’s worth starting with PAG1.

RKV v JWC [2025] EWFC 430 (B)

Recorder Rhys Taylor. Final hearing in W’s financial remedy application before Recorder Taylor in a case involving significant non-disclosure and non-engagement by H.

JK v LM [2026] EWFC 32 (B)

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/32?court=ewfc

Latest

Beyond Thing 1 and Thing 2: Cryptoassets and the New Property Landscape

Beyond Thing 1 and Thing 2: Cryptoassets and the New Property Landscape

For almost 140 years, bright-eyed law students have been taught that the world of personal property contains only two species of thing: those which can be physically held, and those which can be enforced. Cryptoassets forced the issue.

Now out: Financial Remedies Journal 2026 Issue 1 (Spring 2026)

Now out: Financial Remedies Journal 2026 Issue 1 (Spring 2026)

The new issue of the Financial Remedies Journal is now available.

Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH

Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH

HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS