Robert v Woodall [2016] EWHC 2987 (Ch)
Judgment date: 25 November 2016
Related
DDR v BDR (Financial Remedies, Beneficial Ownership and Insolvency) [2024] EWFC 278
Judgment date: 08 October 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/278
Alexander Chandler KC sitting as a High Court Judge. A complicated case, involving a consideration of three areas of law: insolvency, trusts of land, and financial remedies. Useful analysis of how the courts address the tension between
Till Debt Do Us Part: Bankruptcy and Financial Remedies
Financial remedies practitioners are well-accustomed to advising parties in straitened financial circumstances. Often the central question is how to stretch the available resources to ensure both parties have a roof over their heads. However, when one or both parties find themselves in serious financial difficulty, a less familiar issue may
Gudmundsson v Lin [2024] EWHC 1576 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 June 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/1576
Peel J does his best to put into practice the intention of the original financial remedies order, despite H depriving W of 50% of the FMH by not informing the court that there was a bankruptcy
Related
DDR v BDR (Financial Remedies, Beneficial Ownership and Insolvency) [2024] EWFC 278
Judgment date: 08 October 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/278
Alexander Chandler KC sitting as a High Court Judge. A complicated case, involving a consideration of three areas of law: insolvency, trusts of land, and financial remedies. Useful analysis of how the courts address the tension between
Till Debt Do Us Part: Bankruptcy and Financial Remedies
Financial remedies practitioners are well-accustomed to advising parties in straitened financial circumstances. Often the central question is how to stretch the available resources to ensure both parties have a roof over their heads. However, when one or both parties find themselves in serious financial difficulty, a less familiar issue may
Gudmundsson v Lin [2024] EWHC 1576 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 June 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/1576
Peel J does his best to put into practice the intention of the original financial remedies order, despite H depriving W of 50% of the FMH by not informing the court that there was a bankruptcy
Latest
Ministry of Justice Breaches the Overriding Objective
It is fundamental to the procedural code that dealing with a case justly includes ‘expeditiously and fairly’. The savage cuts imposed by the MOJ, with very limited notice and no widespread consultation, will lead to ‘justice delayed’, i.e. ‘justice denied’.
Your Backup Trial Is Arbitration: the London Financial Remedy Changes
New language has entered the lexicon of London financial remedy lawyers. The Dictionary of Financial Remedies needs a new entry. A spectre has appeared on the horizon casting horrors of preparation for practitioners. Enter the backup trial. How have we got here?
The Financial Remedies Journal annual essay competition
The editorial board of the Financial Remedies Journal is delighted to announce the launch of its second essay competition, which will be open to any undergraduate law or GDL law student from a University in England and Wales. We particularly invite submissions from those who do not yet have a