Richardson v Richardson [2011] EWCA Civ 79, [2011] 2 FLR 244

Judgment date: 08 February 2011

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/79.html

Related

LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/401?query=lin+par

ED v AP [2025] EWFC 399

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2025/399.html

DH v RH (No 6) (Application to Set Aside) [2025] EWFC 175

MacDonald J. Ex-tempore judgment handed down almost 12 months after the final order had been made. W had made various applications following the final order, including to set aside the final order and to commit H, whilst H in response to W’s failure to comply had also made multiple applications.

Read the journal

Related

LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/401?query=lin+par

ED v AP [2025] EWFC 399

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2025/399.html

DH v RH (No 6) (Application to Set Aside) [2025] EWFC 175

MacDonald J. Ex-tempore judgment handed down almost 12 months after the final order had been made. W had made various applications following the final order, including to set aside the final order and to commit H, whilst H in response to W’s failure to comply had also made multiple applications.

Latest

Parliamentary Debate Reveals Government’s Latest Intentions for Financial Remedies and Cohabitation Law Reform

Parliamentary Debate Reveals Government’s Latest Intentions for Financial Remedies and Cohabitation Law Reform

The Government gave a significant update on Monday 10 November 2025 in the House of Lords regarding its plans for financial remedies and cohabitation law reform. It signals a major overhaul of how the law treats relationship breakdown across all types of couples.

Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction

Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction

Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation.

Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings

Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings

In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently?

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS