Refusal of Application for Stay of Divorce Petition [2025] EWFC 377 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/377
Her Honour Judge Cope
Related
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 December 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193
Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
HK v SS [2025] EWFC 5 (B)
Judgment date: 14 January 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/5
HHJ Simmonds, National Lead Judge for Divorce. Guidance on when a delay between conditional order being made, and application for a final order, is delay sufficient to cause the court to question whether a final order
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 December 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193
Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
HK v SS [2025] EWFC 5 (B)
Judgment date: 14 January 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/5
HHJ Simmonds, National Lead Judge for Divorce. Guidance on when a delay between conditional order being made, and application for a final order, is delay sufficient to cause the court to question whether a final order
Latest
Parliamentary Debate Reveals Government’s Latest Intentions for Financial Remedies and Cohabitation Law Reform
The Government gave a significant update on Monday 10 November 2025 in the House of Lords regarding its plans for financial remedies and cohabitation law reform. It signals a major overhaul of how the law treats relationship breakdown across all types of couples.
Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction
Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation.
Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings
In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently?