Refusal of Application for Stay of Divorce Petition [2025] EWFC 377 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/377
Her Honour Judge Cope
Related
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 December 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193
Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
HK v SS [2025] EWFC 5 (B)
Judgment date: 14 January 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/5
HHJ Simmonds, National Lead Judge for Divorce. Guidance on when a delay between conditional order being made, and application for a final order, is delay sufficient to cause the court to question whether a final order
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
JQ v IQ [2025] EWFC 192 (B)
Judgment date: 23 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/192
HHJ Vincent. A Pakistani divorce was deemed to be valid in the UK on public policy grounds and permission was granted for the wife to bring financial remedies proceedings in this jurisdiction.
This hearing concerned the
Ogbedo v Oghenerume-Taiga [2024] EWHC 3193 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 December 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/3193
Sir Jonathan Cohen. This is a successful application of NO (herein referred to as ‘F’) to strike out MT’s (herein referred to as ‘M’) application for nullity pursuant to FPR 4.4 on the basis
HK v SS [2025] EWFC 5 (B)
Judgment date: 14 January 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/5
HHJ Simmonds, National Lead Judge for Divorce. Guidance on when a delay between conditional order being made, and application for a final order, is delay sufficient to cause the court to question whether a final order
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.