Read v Panzone & Read [2019] EWCA Civ 1662
Judgment date: 09 October 2019
Related
BM v MB and Others [2025] EWFC 129
Fiona Hay sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge. Final hearing. The key issues revolved around a business which H had inherited shortly before the parties began cohabiting but which had been transformed during the marriage, arguments concerning non-matrimonial property, and a s 37 application.
Michael v Michael [2024] EWFC 463
Judgment date: 12 August 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/463
HHJ Hess, sitting as DCHJ, is concerned at final hearing with the validity of several trust structures set up by H.
Introduction
W was 57. H was 56. The parties were both of Greek Cypriot heritage and
Sayers & Anor v Dixon & Anor [2025] EWHC 1886 (Ch)
ICC Judge Barber. An insolvency case providing a helpful summary of the principles underlying the determination of an allegation of sham.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
BM v MB and Others [2025] EWFC 129
Fiona Hay sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge. Final hearing. The key issues revolved around a business which H had inherited shortly before the parties began cohabiting but which had been transformed during the marriage, arguments concerning non-matrimonial property, and a s 37 application.
Michael v Michael [2024] EWFC 463
Judgment date: 12 August 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/463
HHJ Hess, sitting as DCHJ, is concerned at final hearing with the validity of several trust structures set up by H.
Introduction
W was 57. H was 56. The parties were both of Greek Cypriot heritage and
Sayers & Anor v Dixon & Anor [2025] EWHC 1886 (Ch)
ICC Judge Barber. An insolvency case providing a helpful summary of the principles underlying the determination of an allegation of sham.
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.