R v K [2020] EWHC 841
Judgment date: 27 February 2020
Related
Fiscal Event Update
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-growth-plan-2022-documents
On 23 September 2022 Chancellor of the Exchequer, Kwasi Kwarteng, held a fiscal event where he announced his new Growth Plan for the UK.[[1]] The Institute of Fiscal Studies have said the measures announced represent the biggest tax cut of any budget
B v B [2014] EWHC 4545 (Fam)
Judgment date: 28 November 2014
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4545.html
H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam), [2007] 2 FLR 548
Judgment date: 04 April 2007
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2007/459.html
Related
Fiscal Event Update
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-growth-plan-2022-documents
On 23 September 2022 Chancellor of the Exchequer, Kwasi Kwarteng, held a fiscal event where he announced his new Growth Plan for the UK.[[1]] The Institute of Fiscal Studies have said the measures announced represent the biggest tax cut of any budget
B v B [2014] EWHC 4545 (Fam)
Judgment date: 28 November 2014
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4545.html
H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam), [2007] 2 FLR 548
Judgment date: 04 April 2007
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2007/459.html
Latest
Parliamentary Debate Reveals Government’s Latest Intentions for Financial Remedies and Cohabitation Law Reform
The Government gave a significant update on Monday 10 November 2025 in the House of Lords regarding its plans for financial remedies and cohabitation law reform. It signals a major overhaul of how the law treats relationship breakdown across all types of couples.
Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction
Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation.
Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings
In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently?