R v F [2011] 2 FLR 991, MG and JG v JF [2015] EWHC 564 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 March 2015
Related
MH v FD [2025] EWFC 390
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2025/390.html
Re A Child (Schedule 1, 1989 Act; Variation) [2025] EWHC 1254 (Fam)
McKendrick J. Final Hearing concerning cross-Schedule 1 and specific issue applications brought by both parties. The High Court dismissed all but the respondent father’s application to release his intermediary from undertakings.
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335
Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
MH v FD [2025] EWFC 390
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2025/390.html
Re A Child (Schedule 1, 1989 Act; Variation) [2025] EWHC 1254 (Fam)
McKendrick J. Final Hearing concerning cross-Schedule 1 and specific issue applications brought by both parties. The High Court dismissed all but the respondent father’s application to release his intermediary from undertakings.
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335
Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
Latest
Sir James Munby Obituary
Sir Nicholas Mostyn writes about the life of Sir James Munby, who died on 1 January 2026: "a great leader, a brilliant historian, a remarkable lawyer, and a superb writer".
PD 27A Redux: March 2026 Family Court Bundle Changes Primer
The President has promulgated a revised PD 27A which will come into force on 2 March 2026, designed to modernise the law and embed best practice into one chaptered Practice Direction. This article sets out the key changes practitioners and litigants should be aware of in family proceedings.
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.