Grijns v Grijns & Ors [2025] EWHC 1413 (Ch) Master Bowles (sitting in retirement). Failed proprietary estoppel claim by son who lived in his parentsโ Chelsea property for over 20 years.
In Defence of Legal Fee Loans: The Economics of Access to Justice The recent High Court judgment of Peel J in ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ท ๐๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ญ [2025] EWFC 89 has renewed focus on the role of legal fee lending in family proceedings. This coincides with significant judicial commentary about funding arrangements, including notable judgments in ๐๐๐ ๐ท ๐๐๐ and ๐๐ ๐ท ๐๐.
Ramana v Kist-Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1022?court=ewca%2Fciv&court=ewca%2Fcrim&court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc
BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236 Peel J. Save for four specific matters, parties cannot refer to what happened at the pFDR. The Financial Remedies Court โ Primary Principles paragraph 8 issued by Mostyn J and HHJ Hess goes too far by saying that the court should be told that offers were made and that an was indication given.
Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1055?court=ewca%2Fciv
Ozturk v Ozturk (Reissue 2) [2025] EWFC 162 (B) HHJ Moreton. Committal proceedings relating to a husband who failed to complete his Form E in financial remedy proceedings.