Order 6.3 – Securing Attendance of Witnesses under Arbitration Act 1996, s. 43
Related
Order 22.3: Order Securing Attendance of Witnesses under Arbitration Act 1996 s 43
Order_22.3_-_Order_Securing_Attendance_of_Witnesses_under_Arbitration_Act_1996_s_43[1]order_22.3_-_order_securing_attendance_of_witnesses_under_arbitration_act_1996_s_431.docx36 KBdownload-circle
Order 22.2: Enforcement of Arbitrator’s Peremptory Order under Arbitration Act 1996 s 42
Order_22.2_-_Enforcement_of_Arbitrator's_Peremptory_Order_under_Arbitration_Act_1996_s_42[1]order_22.2_-_enforcement_of_arbitrators_peremptory_order_under_arbitration_act_1996_s_421.docx47 KBdownload-circle
Order 21.1: Production Order
Order_21.1_-_Production_Order[1]order_21.1_-_production_order1.docx43 KBdownload-circle
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
Order 22.3: Order Securing Attendance of Witnesses under Arbitration Act 1996 s 43
Order_22.3_-_Order_Securing_Attendance_of_Witnesses_under_Arbitration_Act_1996_s_43[1]order_22.3_-_order_securing_attendance_of_witnesses_under_arbitration_act_1996_s_431.docx36 KBdownload-circle
Order 22.2: Enforcement of Arbitrator’s Peremptory Order under Arbitration Act 1996 s 42
Order_22.2_-_Enforcement_of_Arbitrator's_Peremptory_Order_under_Arbitration_Act_1996_s_42[1]order_22.2_-_enforcement_of_arbitrators_peremptory_order_under_arbitration_act_1996_s_421.docx47 KBdownload-circle
Order 21.1: Production Order
Order_21.1_-_Production_Order[1]order_21.1_-_production_order1.docx43 KBdownload-circle
Latest
Sir James Munby: an Obituary
Sir Nicholas Mostyn writes about the life of Sir James Munby, who died on 1 January 2026: "a great leader, a brilliant historian, a remarkable lawyer, and a superb writer".
PD 27A Redux: March 2026 Family Court Bundle Changes Primer
The President has promulgated a revised PD 27A which will come into force on 2 March 2026, designed to modernise the law and embed best practice into one chaptered Practice Direction. This article sets out the key changes practitioners and litigants should be aware of in family proceedings.
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.