N v N & F Trust [2005] EWHC 2908 (Fam)
Judgment date: 16 December 2005
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Latest
Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims
[2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well.
A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals
On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs).
50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose?
[2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair.