Cases Costs Needs LF v DF Financial Remedy: Appeal: Costs Debts in a Needs Case) [2021] EWFC B50 Judgment date: 23 August 2021https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2021/B50.html Related VP v SP [2025] EWFC 447 (B) Deputy District Judge Cassidy Hope. Judgment in financial remedy proceedings, addressing needs-based distribution where one party is the primary carer of a disabled adult child. VP v SP [2025] EWFC 447 (B) https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2025/447.html RKV v JWC (No 2) [2025] EWFC 429 (B) Wife is granted a costs order for legal costs on the indemnity basis due to the husband’s ‘complete and multi-faceted’ misconduct, namely deception and refusal to comply with court orders. Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter Related VP v SP [2025] EWFC 447 (B) Deputy District Judge Cassidy Hope. Judgment in financial remedy proceedings, addressing needs-based distribution where one party is the primary carer of a disabled adult child. VP v SP [2025] EWFC 447 (B) https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2025/447.html RKV v JWC (No 2) [2025] EWFC 429 (B) Wife is granted a costs order for legal costs on the indemnity basis due to the husband’s ‘complete and multi-faceted’ misconduct, namely deception and refusal to comply with court orders. Latest Sir James Munby: an Obituary Sir Nicholas Mostyn writes about the life of Sir James Munby, who died on 1 January 2026: "a great leader, a brilliant historian, a remarkable lawyer, and a superb writer". PD 27A Redux: March 2026 Family Court Bundle Changes Primer The President has promulgated a revised PD 27A which will come into force on 2 March 2026, designed to modernise the law and embed best practice into one chaptered Practice Direction. This article sets out the key changes practitioners and litigants should be aware of in family proceedings. An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
VP v SP [2025] EWFC 447 (B) Deputy District Judge Cassidy Hope. Judgment in financial remedy proceedings, addressing needs-based distribution where one party is the primary carer of a disabled adult child.
RKV v JWC (No 2) [2025] EWFC 429 (B) Wife is granted a costs order for legal costs on the indemnity basis due to the husband’s ‘complete and multi-faceted’ misconduct, namely deception and refusal to comply with court orders.
VP v SP [2025] EWFC 447 (B) Deputy District Judge Cassidy Hope. Judgment in financial remedy proceedings, addressing needs-based distribution where one party is the primary carer of a disabled adult child.
RKV v JWC (No 2) [2025] EWFC 429 (B) Wife is granted a costs order for legal costs on the indemnity basis due to the husband’s ‘complete and multi-faceted’ misconduct, namely deception and refusal to comply with court orders.
Sir James Munby: an Obituary Sir Nicholas Mostyn writes about the life of Sir James Munby, who died on 1 January 2026: "a great leader, a brilliant historian, a remarkable lawyer, and a superb writer".
PD 27A Redux: March 2026 Family Court Bundle Changes Primer The President has promulgated a revised PD 27A which will come into force on 2 March 2026, designed to modernise the law and embed best practice into one chaptered Practice Direction. This article sets out the key changes practitioners and litigants should be aware of in family proceedings.
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.