L v L [2008] 1 FLR 26
Judgment date: 02 May 2006
Related
Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam)
Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative.
Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841
LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/401?query=lin+par
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam)
Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative.
Noah Silberschmidt v Nanette Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/2841?query=Silberschmidt+Richards+%5B2025%5D+EWHC+2841
LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/401?query=lin+par
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.