LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401

https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/401?query=lin+par

MR JUSTICE PEEL

Related

K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)

DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.

LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401

Peel J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The couple's 2002 draft consent order had not been sealed by the court, but the parties had acted upon it with the belief that it had been formalised. Peel J determined that it constituted a Xydhias agreement.

Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam)

Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative.

Read the journal

Related

K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)

DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.

LIN v PAR [2025] EWFC 401

Peel J. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The couple's 2002 draft consent order had not been sealed by the court, but the parties had acted upon it with the belief that it had been formalised. Peel J determined that it constituted a Xydhias agreement.

Silberschmidt v Richards [2025] EWHC 2841 (Fam)

Poole J. Husband’s appeal against setting aside of final consent order for fraudulent non-disclosure dismissed; wife’s delay not determinative.

Latest

Learning About Cohabitation Law from Sabrina Carpenter

Learning About Cohabitation Law from Sabrina Carpenter

Sabrina Carpenter’s song ‘House Tour’, which has been topping the charts across the country, is a helpful albeit unconventional springboard to consider the law for unmarried cohabitants as it stands, and comment on how proposed reform might better protect families in England and Wales today.

Section 25(2)(g): Consign It to the Past So Survivors Can Start Their Future

Section 25(2)(g): Consign It to the Past So Survivors Can Start Their Future

Cusworth J's judgments in LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473 and Wei Lyn Loh and Ardal Loh-Granger [2025] EWFC 483 have dusted off s 25(2)(g) MCA 1973. Limited to use in only the most serious instances, this factor should be consigned to the history books.

Recognising Excellence in Financial Remedies

Recognising Excellence in Financial Remedies

Celebrate outstanding achievements and contributions in the field of financial remedies with the Financial Remedies Awards 2026.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS