L-K v K (Brussels II Revised: MPS) [2006] EWHC 153 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 February 2006
Related
OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)
HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 12 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28
Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim.
Background
* Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and
BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2013
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/4250.html
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)
HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 12 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28
Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim.
Background
* Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and
BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2013
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/4250.html
Latest
Beyond Thing 1 and Thing 2: Cryptoassets and the New Property Landscape
For almost 140 years, bright-eyed law students have been taught that the world of personal property contains only two species of thing: those which can be physically held, and those which can be enforced. Cryptoassets forced the issue.
Now out: Financial Remedies Journal 2026 Issue 1 (Spring 2026)
The new issue of the Financial Remedies Journal is now available.
Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH
HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.