FRC Corner Financial Remedies Court: Structure National Guidance Jurisdiction of the family court: Allocation of cases within the family court to high court judge level and transfer of cases from the family court to the high court PFD-Guidance-Jurisdiction-of-the-Family-Court-May-2021 (1)pfd-guidance-jurisdiction-of-the-family-court-may-2021-1.pdf244 KBdownload-circle Related FRC Lead Judges - May 2025 FRC Lead Judges and courts - May 2025frc-lead-judges-and-courts-may-2025.pdf103 KBdownload-circle Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Related FRC Lead Judges - May 2025 FRC Lead Judges and courts - May 2025frc-lead-judges-and-courts-may-2025.pdf103 KBdownload-circle Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle Latest FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court. The Reluctant Pension Credit Member [2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented. Housing Particulars: Mind The Gap What can the court do when there's a significant gap between the bottom of the applicant’s range and the top of the respondent’s range? Can the court take up the invitation made by counsel to ‘conduct its own research on Rightmove if it wishes’? is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
FRC Lead Judges - May 2025 FRC Lead Judges and courts - May 2025frc-lead-judges-and-courts-may-2025.pdf103 KBdownload-circle
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle
Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle
FRC Lead Judges - May 2025 FRC Lead Judges and courts - May 2025frc-lead-judges-and-courts-may-2025.pdf103 KBdownload-circle
Financial Remedy Court Organogram - November 2025 The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025The Financial Remedies Court Organogram - November 2025.pdf1 MBdownload-circle
Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member [2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.
Housing Particulars: Mind The Gap What can the court do when there's a significant gap between the bottom of the applicant’s range and the top of the respondent’s range? Can the court take up the invitation made by counsel to ‘conduct its own research on Rightmove if it wishes’?