Inheritance Act national archives Hulya Kars v Lewis John Brown & Ors Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC 31 (Fam) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2026/31 DHCJ Naomi Davey Related KI (Applicant husband) v SI (Respondent wife) (Sham trusts and intervenor proceedings in financial remedy claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/73?query=EWFC+73+%28B%29 Carl Brendan Hammond v Herrington Carmichael LLP [2026] EWHC 701 (SCCO) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/scco/2026/701?query=%5B2026%5D+EWHC+701+%28SCCO%29 Anne Morag Fotheringhame v Antony David Nelson [2026] EWHC 632 (Ch) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/632 Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring Related KI (Applicant husband) v SI (Respondent wife) (Sham trusts and intervenor proceedings in financial remedy claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/73?query=EWFC+73+%28B%29 Carl Brendan Hammond v Herrington Carmichael LLP [2026] EWHC 701 (SCCO) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/scco/2026/701?query=%5B2026%5D+EWHC+701+%28SCCO%29 Anne Morag Fotheringhame v Antony David Nelson [2026] EWHC 632 (Ch) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/632 Latest Portals: Bringing It All Together Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court. FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court. The Reluctant Pension Credit Member [2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
KI (Applicant husband) v SI (Respondent wife) (Sham trusts and intervenor proceedings in financial remedy claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/73?query=EWFC+73+%28B%29
Carl Brendan Hammond v Herrington Carmichael LLP [2026] EWHC 701 (SCCO) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/scco/2026/701?query=%5B2026%5D+EWHC+701+%28SCCO%29
Anne Morag Fotheringhame v Antony David Nelson [2026] EWHC 632 (Ch) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/632
KI (Applicant husband) v SI (Respondent wife) (Sham trusts and intervenor proceedings in financial remedy claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/73?query=EWFC+73+%28B%29
Carl Brendan Hammond v Herrington Carmichael LLP [2026] EWHC 701 (SCCO) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/scco/2026/701?query=%5B2026%5D+EWHC+701+%28SCCO%29
Anne Morag Fotheringhame v Antony David Nelson [2026] EWHC 632 (Ch) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/632
Portals: Bringing It All Together Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member [2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.