Anne Morag Fotheringhame v Antony David Nelson [2026] EWHC 632 (Ch)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/632
Anne Morag Fotheringhame v Antony David Nelson - Find Case Law - The National Archives
HH JUDGE KLEIN SITTING AS A HIGH COURT JUDGE
Related
The Lesser Known ‘Acquisition Constructive Trust’ after Khan v Khan [2025] EWCA Civ 1436 and Why Financial Remedy Lawyers Need to Know About It
[2026] 1 FRJ 19. When thinking of constructive trusts, most financial remedy lawyers will have in mind the common intention constructive trust. However, this is not the only type of constructive trust. The newly christened ‘acquisition constructive trust’ is one with which to become familiar.
What’s App Doc?
Reid-Roberts & Ors v Mei-Lin & Gudmundson [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch) has caused a media stir. The headlines are all about whether you can give your home away by a WhatsApp. However, the decision is more interesting and of wider application for financial remedy practitioners than these soundbites suggest.
Khan & Ors v Khan [2025] EWCA Civ 1436
Asplin, Nugee and Miles LJJ. The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant’s appeal against the High Court’s findings that the claimants had beneficial interests in properties belonging to the family.
Related
The Lesser Known ‘Acquisition Constructive Trust’ after Khan v Khan [2025] EWCA Civ 1436 and Why Financial Remedy Lawyers Need to Know About It
[2026] 1 FRJ 19. When thinking of constructive trusts, most financial remedy lawyers will have in mind the common intention constructive trust. However, this is not the only type of constructive trust. The newly christened ‘acquisition constructive trust’ is one with which to become familiar.
What’s App Doc?
Reid-Roberts & Ors v Mei-Lin & Gudmundson [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch) has caused a media stir. The headlines are all about whether you can give your home away by a WhatsApp. However, the decision is more interesting and of wider application for financial remedy practitioners than these soundbites suggest.
Khan & Ors v Khan [2025] EWCA Civ 1436
Asplin, Nugee and Miles LJJ. The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant’s appeal against the High Court’s findings that the claimants had beneficial interests in properties belonging to the family.
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.