FRC Corner Delete Templates Form PPF1: Pension Protection Fund (PPF) - Sharing annex to a Pension Compensation Sharing Order [section 24E of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973] [paragraph 19A of Schedule 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-ppf1-pension-protection-fund-ppf-sharing-annex-to-a-pension-compensation-sharing-order-section-24e-of-the-matrimonial-causes-act-1973-par Related ES2 template - July 2025 ES2-July-2025es2-july-2025.xlsx25 KBdownload-circle Notes on the Revised ES2 Template ES2-notes.July2025es2-notes.july2025.pdf166 KBdownload-circle Order 23.1: Child Deprivation of Liberty Order Order_23.1_-_Child_Deprivation_of_Liberty_Order[1]order_23.1_-_child_deprivation_of_liberty_order1.docx52 KBdownload-circle Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter Related ES2 template - July 2025 ES2-July-2025es2-july-2025.xlsx25 KBdownload-circle Notes on the Revised ES2 Template ES2-notes.July2025es2-notes.july2025.pdf166 KBdownload-circle Order 23.1: Child Deprivation of Liberty Order Order_23.1_-_Child_Deprivation_of_Liberty_Order[1]order_23.1_-_child_deprivation_of_liberty_order1.docx52 KBdownload-circle Latest Parliamentary Debate Reveals Government’s Latest Intentions for Financial Remedies and Cohabitation Law Reform The Government gave a significant update on Monday 10 November 2025 in the House of Lords regarding its plans for financial remedies and cohabitation law reform. It signals a major overhaul of how the law treats relationship breakdown across all types of couples. Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation. Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently? is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
Order 23.1: Child Deprivation of Liberty Order Order_23.1_-_Child_Deprivation_of_Liberty_Order[1]order_23.1_-_child_deprivation_of_liberty_order1.docx52 KBdownload-circle
Order 23.1: Child Deprivation of Liberty Order Order_23.1_-_Child_Deprivation_of_Liberty_Order[1]order_23.1_-_child_deprivation_of_liberty_order1.docx52 KBdownload-circle
Parliamentary Debate Reveals Government’s Latest Intentions for Financial Remedies and Cohabitation Law Reform The Government gave a significant update on Monday 10 November 2025 in the House of Lords regarding its plans for financial remedies and cohabitation law reform. It signals a major overhaul of how the law treats relationship breakdown across all types of couples.
Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation.
Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently?