DE v AB [2010] EWHC 3792 (Fam)
Judgment date: 30 November 2010
Related
Re N (A Child) (Financial Provision: Contact Travel Costs) [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
DDJ Vickers. Mother’s application for financial support pursuant to Schedule 1 Children Act 1989. She sought orders for periodical payments including backdated payments. Father sought reimbursement for various child-related expenses he had incurred and to offset that against her claim.
N (A child) (Financial provision: contact travel costs), Re [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/18?query=N+%28A+Child%29%2C+Re+%28Financial+provision%3A+contact+travel+costs%29+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+18+%28B%29
MH v FD [2025] EWFC 390
Mr Justin Warshaw KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Application for interim relief within proceedings brought under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989. The father took the 'millionaire's defence'.
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Re N (A Child) (Financial Provision: Contact Travel Costs) [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
DDJ Vickers. Mother’s application for financial support pursuant to Schedule 1 Children Act 1989. She sought orders for periodical payments including backdated payments. Father sought reimbursement for various child-related expenses he had incurred and to offset that against her claim.
N (A child) (Financial provision: contact travel costs), Re [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/18?query=N+%28A+Child%29%2C+Re+%28Financial+provision%3A+contact+travel+costs%29+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+18+%28B%29
MH v FD [2025] EWFC 390
Mr Justin Warshaw KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge. Application for interim relief within proceedings brought under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989. The father took the 'millionaire's defence'.
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.