Davis (As Trustee in Bankruptcy of Audley Glendon Jackson) v Jackson & Jackson [2017] EWHC 698 (Ch)
Judgment date: 07 April 2017
Related
Maxine Reid-Roberts & Anor v Hsiao Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/49
Bankruptcy and Divorce: An Unhappy Marriage
The bankruptcy of a party can add additional layers of complexity to financial remedy proceedings. This article aims to mitigate this, by providing an overview of the process, considering its impact on final financial remedy orders being made, and setting out practical and procedural considerations.
Michael v Michael [2024] EWFC 463
Judgment date: 12 August 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/463
HHJ Hess, sitting as DCHJ, is concerned at final hearing with the validity of several trust structures set up by H.
Introduction
W was 57. H was 56. The parties were both of Greek Cypriot heritage and
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Maxine Reid-Roberts & Anor v Hsiao Mei-Lin & Anor [2026] EWHC 49 (Ch)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/49
Bankruptcy and Divorce: An Unhappy Marriage
The bankruptcy of a party can add additional layers of complexity to financial remedy proceedings. This article aims to mitigate this, by providing an overview of the process, considering its impact on final financial remedy orders being made, and setting out practical and procedural considerations.
Michael v Michael [2024] EWFC 463
Judgment date: 12 August 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/463
HHJ Hess, sitting as DCHJ, is concerned at final hearing with the validity of several trust structures set up by H.
Introduction
W was 57. H was 56. The parties were both of Greek Cypriot heritage and
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.