CP v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (CSM) [2015] UKUT 391 (AAC)

Judgment date: 09 July 2015

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2015/391.html

Other recent cases

H v W (Xydhias Agreements) [2025] EWFC 163 (B)

District Judge Field. W's application that H should show cause as to why a final order in their financial remedy proceedings should not be made to reflect a concluded agreement alleged to have been made in correspondence, subject to matters of implementation and court approval.

JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335

Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.

AT v NB (Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 248 (B)

DDJ Mark Harrop. Judgment on wife's application for interim maintenance.

Read the journal

Other recent cases

H v W (Xydhias Agreements) [2025] EWFC 163 (B)

District Judge Field. W's application that H should show cause as to why a final order in their financial remedy proceedings should not be made to reflect a concluded agreement alleged to have been made in correspondence, subject to matters of implementation and court approval.

JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335

Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.

AT v NB (Maintenance Pending Suit) [2025] EWFC 248 (B)

DDJ Mark Harrop. Judgment on wife's application for interim maintenance.

Latest

The Costs of ‘Costs of Sale’

The Costs of ‘Costs of Sale’

As part of the computation stage of financial remedy proceedings great care is taken to ascertain the accurate net value of the family home and other property owned by the parties or in which they have an interest.

Helliwell v Entwistle: Some Troubling Aspects

Helliwell v Entwistle: Some Troubling Aspects

Following King LJ’s judgment in Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055, Sir Nicholas Mostyn reconsiders his reasoning in Cummings v Fawn [2023] EWHC 830 (Fam) and concludes that some of his language needs to be modified.

A Divorce, Gaslighting, Lack of Transparency, and a Port

A Divorce, Gaslighting, Lack of Transparency, and a Port

Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham (with Alexander Thorpe KC and Saima Younis) represented the wife in TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1959 (Fam). The judge had to untangle a web of hidden assets, misleading disclosures and a multi-million-pound port deal to determine a fair financial settlement.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS