Buehrlen v Buehrlen [2017] EWHC 3643 (Fam)

Judgment date: 24 November 2017

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2017/3643.html

Related

Money Corner: Divorcing Couples and the Family Home – Five Tax Pitfalls

The aim of this article is to highlight the main pitfalls that pertain to the transfer/sale of the family home. Though these only come to light once lawyers are no longer involved, we can offer value to our clients by highlighting such issues before they discover them for themselves.

IN v CH [2025] EWFC 265 (08 July 2025)

W’s application for financial remedies. Trowell J was tasked with dividing the remaining assets of a couple who had previously enjoyed immense wealth that was significantly diminished due to the consequences of war.

BY v GC [2025] EWFC 226

Mr Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). In Financial Remedy proceedings, Nicholas Allen KC refused Daniels v Walker application to rely on expert evidence that valued the main business interests at less than the Single Joint Expert (SJE).

Read the journal

Related

Money Corner: Divorcing Couples and the Family Home – Five Tax Pitfalls

The aim of this article is to highlight the main pitfalls that pertain to the transfer/sale of the family home. Though these only come to light once lawyers are no longer involved, we can offer value to our clients by highlighting such issues before they discover them for themselves.

IN v CH [2025] EWFC 265 (08 July 2025)

W’s application for financial remedies. Trowell J was tasked with dividing the remaining assets of a couple who had previously enjoyed immense wealth that was significantly diminished due to the consequences of war.

BY v GC [2025] EWFC 226

Mr Nicholas Allen KC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). In Financial Remedy proceedings, Nicholas Allen KC refused Daniels v Walker application to rely on expert evidence that valued the main business interests at less than the Single Joint Expert (SJE).

Latest

The Astonishing Fate of Scott v Scott (1911-1913)

The Astonishing Fate of Scott v Scott (1911-1913)

Secrecy in family cases from the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes (1858) to the Financial Remedies Court (2024)

The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality

The Consequences of Late Service of an N260 for Summary Assessment of Costs: Prejudice and Proportionality

The requirement to serve a statement of costs (Form N260) for the purposes of summary assessment of costs is set out in CPR PD 44 para 9.5. But what are the consequences of a breach of the rule to serve the statement of costs not less than 24 hours before the start of the hearing?

Is It Time for the Conclusions in Waggott to Be Reconsidered?

Is It Time for the Conclusions in Waggott to Be Reconsidered?

There is arguably a far greater understanding now than there was even as recently as 2018 of domestic abuse and the wide-reaching and long-lasting impact that it can have. Does this mean it is time for the Court of Appeal to reconsider the conclusions it reached in Waggott?

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS