AO v EO [2026] EWFC 30 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/30?query=%5B2026%5D+EWFC+30+%28B
AO v EO - Find Case Law - The National Archives
HIS HONOUR JUDGE EDWARD HESS
Related
AO v EO [2026] EWFC 30 (B)
HHJ Edward Hess. Judgment in financial remedy proceedings, addressing habitual residence and forum conveniens where the parties had competing connections to England and Nigeria.
CA v UK [2025] EWFC 117 (B)
Judgment date: 10 January 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/117
HHJ Watkins. A substantive application by the father for a child maintenance order under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 (‘Schedule 1’); [12]. Within the application, the main issue concerned the most suitable jurisdiction for
Re CB (Financial Remedies: Antisuit Injunction) [2025] EWHC 427 (Fam)
Judgment date: 25 February 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/427
HHJ Moradifar. Application by the husband for an anti-suit injunction to prevent the wife from pursuing, participating or otherwise continuing any applications for periodical payments for the children of the family or any other applications relating
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
AO v EO [2026] EWFC 30 (B)
HHJ Edward Hess. Judgment in financial remedy proceedings, addressing habitual residence and forum conveniens where the parties had competing connections to England and Nigeria.
CA v UK [2025] EWFC 117 (B)
Judgment date: 10 January 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/117
HHJ Watkins. A substantive application by the father for a child maintenance order under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 (‘Schedule 1’); [12]. Within the application, the main issue concerned the most suitable jurisdiction for
Re CB (Financial Remedies: Antisuit Injunction) [2025] EWHC 427 (Fam)
Judgment date: 25 February 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/427
HHJ Moradifar. Application by the husband for an anti-suit injunction to prevent the wife from pursuing, participating or otherwise continuing any applications for periodical payments for the children of the family or any other applications relating
Latest
Portals: Bringing It All Together
Tips and tricks on using the digital court portals from a member of the stakeholder group for the profession, including how to avoid the double login, when to denote documents as confidential, and how to prompt a response from the court.
FRJ – ‘Well, He (or She) Didn’t Ask!’ – the Impact of Non-Disclosure When the Question Isn’t Asked
Is it a shield to non-disclosure by one party during financial remedy proceedings if the other party could (and perhaps should) have asked? The duty on parties to give full and frank financial disclosure is not merely a private obligation between them; it is a duty to the court.
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.