Cases
Sharing Principle
Matrimonial and Non-Matrimonial Property
Bonuses
Special Contribution
Valuations
XW v XH [2019] EWCA Civ 2262
Judgment date: 18 December 2019
Related
RKV v JWC [2025] EWFC 430 (B)
Recorder Rhys Taylor. Final hearing in W’s financial remedy application before Recorder Taylor in a case involving significant non-disclosure and non-engagement by H.
BS v HC [2026] EWFC 20 (B)
HHJ Hess. Final hearing in financial remedies proceedings. HHJ Hess dealt with questions of ‘matrimonialisation’ surrounding H’s pensions in light of the decision in Standish.
BS v HC [2026] EWFC 20 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/20?query=BS+HC+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+20+%28B%29
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
RKV v JWC [2025] EWFC 430 (B)
Recorder Rhys Taylor. Final hearing in W’s financial remedy application before Recorder Taylor in a case involving significant non-disclosure and non-engagement by H.
BS v HC [2026] EWFC 20 (B)
HHJ Hess. Final hearing in financial remedies proceedings. HHJ Hess dealt with questions of ‘matrimonialisation’ surrounding H’s pensions in light of the decision in Standish.
BS v HC [2026] EWFC 20 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/20?query=BS+HC+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+20+%28B%29
Latest
The Reluctant Pension Credit Member
[2026] 1 FRJ 39. In the case of AP v TP [2025] EWFC 190 (B) a financial remedy order was made by consent, following an FDR, which included a pension sharing order in W’s favour. Difficulties began when W failed to provide the necessary information to permit the pension share to be implemented.
Piercing Trust Structures in Switzerland in Aid of Financial Claims in England
[2026] 1 FRJ 26. Swiss courts possess domestic tools to pierce through foreign trust structures and make orders in respect of their underlying assets. This article examines what those tools are and how they may be deployed in aid of financial remedies proceedings in England.
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.