X v F [2025] EWFC 538 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/538
X v F - Find Case Law - The National Archives
HHJ Edward Hess
Related
Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT
This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this.
HA v EN [2025] EWHC 2436 (Fam)
The Hon. Richard Todd KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge). Court varies Xydhias agreement, imposing significant contingent reduction in maintenance following change in circumstances.
H v W (Xydhias Agreements) [2025] EWFC 163 (B)
District Judge Field. W's application that H should show cause as to why a final order in their financial remedy proceedings should not be made to reflect a concluded agreement alleged to have been made in correspondence, subject to matters of implementation and court approval.
Related
Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT
This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this.
HA v EN [2025] EWHC 2436 (Fam)
The Hon. Richard Todd KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge). Court varies Xydhias agreement, imposing significant contingent reduction in maintenance following change in circumstances.
H v W (Xydhias Agreements) [2025] EWFC 163 (B)
District Judge Field. W's application that H should show cause as to why a final order in their financial remedy proceedings should not be made to reflect a concluded agreement alleged to have been made in correspondence, subject to matters of implementation and court approval.
Latest
The Calculation Conundrum: Top-Up Maintenance After the Morgan Appeals
A maximum CMS maintenance calculation is a condition precedent of a top-up order. But could a subsequent decision by the CMS bring the court’s order to an end?
Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT
This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this.
Obligations, Responsibilities and the One-Liner
The law in England and Wales is under scrutiny and may well be changed. There are discussions about the extent to which the welfare of children should be the primary or paramount consideration. Whatever we might think of that, do we not need to look again at obligations and responsibilities?