White v White [2003] EWCA Civ 924
Judgment date: 19 May 2003
Related
KI v SI (Sham Trusts and Intervenor Proceedings in Financial Remedy Claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B)
Judgment of District Judge Hatvany at a preliminary issue hearing concerning the determination of whether purported trust deeds in favour of intervenors within financial remedy claims were shams.
Re N (A Child) (Financial Provision: Contact Travel Costs) [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
DDJ Vickers. Mother’s application for financial support pursuant to Schedule 1 Children Act 1989. She sought orders for periodical payments including backdated payments. Father sought reimbursement for various child-related expenses he had incurred and to offset that against her claim.
N (A child) (Financial provision: contact travel costs), Re [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/18?query=N+%28A+Child%29%2C+Re+%28Financial+provision%3A+contact+travel+costs%29+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+18+%28B%29
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
KI v SI (Sham Trusts and Intervenor Proceedings in Financial Remedy Claims) [2026] EWFC 73 (B)
Judgment of District Judge Hatvany at a preliminary issue hearing concerning the determination of whether purported trust deeds in favour of intervenors within financial remedy claims were shams.
Re N (A Child) (Financial Provision: Contact Travel Costs) [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
DDJ Vickers. Mother’s application for financial support pursuant to Schedule 1 Children Act 1989. She sought orders for periodical payments including backdated payments. Father sought reimbursement for various child-related expenses he had incurred and to offset that against her claim.
N (A child) (Financial provision: contact travel costs), Re [2026] EWFC 18 (B)
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/18?query=N+%28A+Child%29%2C+Re+%28Financial+provision%3A+contact+travel+costs%29+%5B2026%5D+EWFC+18+%28B%29
Latest
The Fairer End to Relationships Consultation: The FRJ's Complete Coverage
The Government's Fairer End to Relationships consultation has sparked significant discussion about the future of cohabitation, marriage, divorce and financial remedies on relationship breakdown. Throughout the consultation period, we have published a series of articles exploring the key proposals, their potential impact on individuals and families, and the
What Family Lawyers Can Learn from Both Sides of the Border
Reform of this scale invites comparison. At a recent roundtable, family law specialists from Hugh James and Brodies brought together practitioners from Wales and Scotland to test where each jurisdiction might learn from the other.
Burning Down the House (That We Once Shared for 3 Years) to Roast the Pig: The Problem with the Cohabitation Reform Proposals
Part 2 of the Ministry of Justice’s consultation paper, A Fairer End to Relationships, proposes a financial remedies scheme for cohabitants on separation. It casts the net far too wide. If legislation goes through as proposed, an unfair regime will be foisted on millions of couples.