Veluppillai v Chief Land Registrar, Veluppillai & Bank of Scotland [2017] EWHC 1693 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 April 2017
Related
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335
Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
M v B [2025] EWFC 182
Judgment date: 25 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182
Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A.
The
Galbraith-Marten v De Renee (Extension of Extended Civil Restraint Order) [2025] EWFC 96
Judgment date: 15 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/96
Cobb J. Application for an extension of an extended civil restraint order and an application for further financial orders within long-running financial remedy proceedings.
Facts
The parties had been engaged in litigation in England and Australia in
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
JT v RL & Anor [2025] EWHC 1335
Keehan J. Application by mother to enforce a contract in relation to a property purchased for her and the parties’ child.
M v B [2025] EWFC 182
Judgment date: 25 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182
Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A.
The
Galbraith-Marten v De Renee (Extension of Extended Civil Restraint Order) [2025] EWFC 96
Judgment date: 15 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/96
Cobb J. Application for an extension of an extended civil restraint order and an application for further financial orders within long-running financial remedy proceedings.
Facts
The parties had been engaged in litigation in England and Australia in
Latest
An End to Secrecy in Family Courts? Proposed Reforms of Contempt of Court Law That Could Lift the Threats to Sharing Information
It’s common knowledge that people involved in family court proceedings held in private are very restricted in what they can say about what’s happening. The confusing part is when someone might be in contempt of court just for talking or writing about their case, even when anonymised.
The Absent Owner – Varying Beneficial Interests Upon Separation: an Analysis of the Leading Cases
Considering TLATA cases where A and B are joint owners of a family home, the relationship breaks down, and A vacates leaving B in occupation and financially responsible for the property, and then A returns years later seeking their share of the net equity.
When Might an Arbitration Not Be Entirely Private and Confidential?
One of the great virtues of family law arbitration is its ability to provide the parties with confidentiality and privacy for their dispute. Unlike court proceedings, the parties will not face the risk of the hearing taking place in open court with curious members of the public present.