TW and TM (Minors) [2015] EWHC 3054 (Fam)
Judgment date: 24 July 2015
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Latest
Tech Corner: Only 11%. What Technology Can Do About the Pensions Gap on Divorce
[2026] 3 FRJ 266. Only 11% of divorcees with a pension not yet in payment made any arrangement to share it, according to the Fair Shares study, which also found that over a third of divorcees did not know the value of their own pension. Ignoring the pensions is not an option.
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: Time for Greater Discipline?
[2026] 3 FRJ 206. If costs discipline is to be meaningful, parties must understand from the outset that disproportionate litigation expenditure will ultimately remain their own responsibility even in a needs case. Money spent on costs is money removed from the resources available to the family.
IFoA Working Party for Pensions on Divorce: Full Resources Now Published
Building on the work of the Pensions Advisory Group and the IFoA thematic review of work by actuary PODEs, an IFoA working party has published essential new materials to further develop good practice in this area. Family lawyers should look for, and request, PODE adoption of these materials.