TW and TM (Minors) [2015] EWHC 3054 (Fam)
Judgment date: 24 July 2015
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Latest
The Fairer End to Relationships Consultation: The FRJ's Complete Coverage
The Government's Fairer End to Relationships consultation has sparked significant discussion about the future of cohabitation, marriage, divorce and financial remedies on relationship breakdown. Throughout the consultation period, we have published a series of articles exploring the key proposals, their potential impact on individuals and families, and the
What Family Lawyers Can Learn from Both Sides of the Border
Reform of this scale invites comparison. At a recent roundtable, family law specialists from Hugh James and Brodies brought together practitioners from Wales and Scotland to test where each jurisdiction might learn from the other.
Burning Down the House (That We Once Shared for 3 Years) to Roast the Pig: The Problem with the Cohabitation Reform Proposals
Part 2 of the Ministry of Justice’s consultation paper, A Fairer End to Relationships, proposes a financial remedies scheme for cohabitants on separation. It casts the net far too wide. If legislation goes through as proposed, an unfair regime will be foisted on millions of couples.