The Digital Portal in the London FRC 27-10-22
Related
Managing a case - Contested
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/myhmcts-how-to-use-online-financial-remedy-services/managing-a-case-contested#upload-a-draft-order
Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View
Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle
West Midlands FR Zone Local Practice Direction
West Mids local practice direction for distributionwest-mids-local-practice-direction-for-distribution.pdf273 KBdownload-circle
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 3 | Winter
Related
Managing a case - Contested
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/myhmcts-how-to-use-online-financial-remedy-services/managing-a-case-contested#upload-a-draft-order
Rules for Naming Documents to be uploaded to Case File View
Rules_for_naming_documents_FR_Contestedrules_for_naming_documents_fr_contested.pdf260 KBdownload-circle
West Midlands FR Zone Local Practice Direction
West Mids local practice direction for distributionwest-mids-local-practice-direction-for-distribution.pdf273 KBdownload-circle
Latest
Parliamentary Debate Reveals Government’s Latest Intentions for Financial Remedies and Cohabitation Law Reform
The Government gave a significant update on Monday 10 November 2025 in the House of Lords regarding its plans for financial remedies and cohabitation law reform. It signals a major overhaul of how the law treats relationship breakdown across all types of couples.
Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction
Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation.
Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings
In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently?