Cases Mesher Orders and Deferred Charges Open in Tattersall v Tattersall (Ancillary Relief) (Need: Departure from Equality) [2013] EWCA Civ 774 Judgment date: 09 July 2013http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/774.html Related IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs. KC v CO (Deceased) (Orders for Sale after Death of a Party) [2026] EWFC 165 (B) 18 June 2026. DDJ Harrop. The husband’s application for an order for sale under s 24A(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 was struck out under FPR 4.4(1)(a), in that its availability had not survived the death of the wife. KC v CO (deceased) (Orders for Sale after Death of a Party) [2026] EWFC 165 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/165 Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs. KC v CO (Deceased) (Orders for Sale after Death of a Party) [2026] EWFC 165 (B) 18 June 2026. DDJ Harrop. The husband’s application for an order for sale under s 24A(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 was struck out under FPR 4.4(1)(a), in that its availability had not survived the death of the wife. KC v CO (deceased) (Orders for Sale after Death of a Party) [2026] EWFC 165 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/165 Latest The Financial Remedies Conference 2026 Elizabeth Bowden reports from the Class Legal Financial Remedies Conference. The Financial Remedies Awards 2026 Charlotte Lanning (Chief Showbiz Reporter for the Financial Remedies Journal) reports from the second ever Financial Remedies Awards. The Calculation Conundrum: Top-Up Maintenance After the Morgan Appeals [2026] 3 FRJ 252. A maximum CMS maintenance calculation is a condition precedent of a top-up order. But could a subsequent decision by the CMS bring the court’s order to an end? is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs.
KC v CO (Deceased) (Orders for Sale after Death of a Party) [2026] EWFC 165 (B) 18 June 2026. DDJ Harrop. The husband’s application for an order for sale under s 24A(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 was struck out under FPR 4.4(1)(a), in that its availability had not survived the death of the wife.
KC v CO (deceased) (Orders for Sale after Death of a Party) [2026] EWFC 165 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/165
IC v AD [2026] EWFC 224 20 July 2026. HHJ Hess (sitting as a deputy High Court judge). Final hearing to consider the extent to which the terms of a pre-nuptial agreement should be upheld following an assessment of the parties' needs.
KC v CO (Deceased) (Orders for Sale after Death of a Party) [2026] EWFC 165 (B) 18 June 2026. DDJ Harrop. The husband’s application for an order for sale under s 24A(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 was struck out under FPR 4.4(1)(a), in that its availability had not survived the death of the wife.
KC v CO (deceased) (Orders for Sale after Death of a Party) [2026] EWFC 165 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/165
The Financial Remedies Conference 2026 Elizabeth Bowden reports from the Class Legal Financial Remedies Conference.
The Financial Remedies Awards 2026 Charlotte Lanning (Chief Showbiz Reporter for the Financial Remedies Journal) reports from the second ever Financial Remedies Awards.
The Calculation Conundrum: Top-Up Maintenance After the Morgan Appeals [2026] 3 FRJ 252. A maximum CMS maintenance calculation is a condition precedent of a top-up order. But could a subsequent decision by the CMS bring the court’s order to an end?